01Technical extraction
- Evidence
- Specifications and drawings
- Operation
- Schema-based extraction
- Control
- Source citation
- Result
- Comparable values
Initial commercial module
Procurement Intelligence
Procurement Intelligence reads controlled requirements and vendor submissions, constructs a compliance matrix, identifies deviations, prepares technical and commercial comparisons, and waits for engineer approval.
StatusInitial commercial module
Reviewed2026-08-20
Direct answer
Procurement Intelligence reads controlled requirements and vendor submissions, constructs a compliance matrix, identifies deviations, prepares technical and commercial comparisons, and waits for engineer approval.
Evidence ledger
What enters, what changes, what remains accountable.
02Compliance
- Evidence
- Requirement and vendor claim
- Operation
- Rule and model comparison
- Control
- Exception review
- Result
- Comply/deviate/missing
03Recommendation
- Evidence
- Technical, commercial and risk context
- Operation
- Option analysis
- Control
- Engineer approval
- Result
- Defensible decision
01Requirement control
Comparable evaluation starts before responses arrive.
RFQ schedules define required fields, evidence, acceptance criteria, exceptions and submission structure.
02Vendor evidence
Claims remain attached to source documents.
Extraction normalizes comparable values while preserving document, revision, page and evidence span.
03Recommendation
Risk and exception are visible.
The system prepares options, missing evidence, deviations and trade-offs for an engineer to approve, reject or correct.
Process / controlled sequence
From input to accountable outcome.
- 01Ingest requirement and RFQ
- 02Register vendor and revision
- 03Extract specification claims
- 04Build compliance matrix
- 05Flag deviations and omissions
- 06Compare commercial context
- 07Prepare recommendation
- 08Record expert decision
Design boundary
What the system will not pretend to be.
No invented compliance
Missing evidence remains missing rather than being completed by the model.
No hidden commercial weighting
Criteria and trade-offs remain explicit and reviewable.
No final authority transfer
The system records the engineer’s decision as the controlling outcome.